furry pumpkin_patch tentacles vines

Jangle: Cute!!!

Totallynotamadeupname: "POST FURRIES & POKEMON TO YCHAN."

No offence, but it's right up there on the top of all the pages.

braenuun: There have been plenty of other uploads of anthros used in all the myriad ways that tentacles like to use things without them being problematic.

I always understood that rule as "flurries and pokemon don't count as monsters or tentacles"

I mean, there ARE plenty of tentacles among these.

Archanid: Azrael stated on pic 85049 that so long as it includes tentacles with the furries, it’s okay. The rule is meant for just furry-on-furry content.

coquettishcat: This really isn’t that furry anyway...

spurgasburt: @Azrael, we need to either enforce that rule for real or change how it is written. The furries are already here, too late for that. If we are going to limit furry content in some way, the rules need to be more specific as to how. Otherwise the boundary line will be pushed further and further until the non-furry content is lost beneath a tide of yiffing dragoncats and foxtaurs with a single tentacle in a butt for technical compliance.

kaycichan: @spurgasburt: I agree we should have a rule on emphasis on the tentacle. I'm fine with one or two anthros getting raped by tentacles, so long as it's more about the tentacles

Azrael: As Archanid stated above, if there are tentacles in the pic then it belongs here.

Revenant: Yeah, but what about flurries?

TSIBP: Rules seem to be working fine as is lol