Data 1: I know this might sound wierd but...
Even though these images are fictious and we are allowed to indulge in our fantasies as much as we choose is it not slighly immoral (and unhealthy) to keep on looking at females as objects for sex? Even though these comments (on this image and others) could be a throw away joke could there be a danger of mixing our fantasies and realities together? (?.?)
keren_sky: I've often wondered about that. Like if a guy has a female superior/employer and he looks @ porn a lot might his attitude towards is superior suffer?
Probably there is a danger of mixing, I'm sure it has occurred.
Stingfish: That's one of the main reasons that younger kids are discouraged from watching porn; adults are concerned that it might warp their views on what is expected and acceptable.
Data 1: Guys lead short dangerous lives and expire
Girls lead long lives because they have to raise children and help the next generation in raising their offspring.
In reality the human race was originally a matriarchial society (women controlled what happened) as women tended to live longer than men (because guys as a rule of thumb tend to be stupid (an I am a guy...)) and thus had greater say over what the group would do. Guys are more or less:
a) a way to create genetic diversity
b) there to do the stuff women can't do (e.g. drive, rape people, start wars, etc.) ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZD (REALLY drunk face)
In short guys = short lived therefore the rapists are more likely to get their genes passed on.
girls = would like to do the same thing as guys just can't because they can get pregnant + have to raise children.
Millia: That only applies when survival of the species is at stake.
i.e. not today, the only thing holding women back is obsolete traditions. And even so women have been capable leaders, and drivers, and better flyers, and have started war, and yes, even raped people. I know the last one for a fact.
Your analysis is out of date by some 100,000 years.
Data 1: I know but still when one debates are tries to start a discussion it gets very difficult to judge all sides equally and must take a stand with one side of another...
Achmed: Causing terror is easy... being politically correct is a pain in the as*!
Link to Image
You can turn off the ads by registering and logging in!
Comments
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Even though these images are fictious and we are allowed to indulge in our fantasies as much as we choose is it not slighly immoral (and unhealthy) to keep on looking at females as objects for sex? Even though these comments (on this image and others) could be a throw away joke could there be a danger of mixing our fantasies and realities together? (?.?)
- Reply
Probably there is a danger of mixing, I'm sure it has occurred.
Girls lead long lives because they have to raise children and help the next generation in raising their offspring.
In reality the human race was originally a matriarchial society (women controlled what happened) as women tended to live longer than men (because guys as a rule of thumb tend to be stupid (an I am a guy...)) and thus had greater say over what the group would do. Guys are more or less:
a) a way to create genetic diversity
b) there to do the stuff women can't do (e.g. drive, rape people, start wars, etc.) ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZD (REALLY drunk face)
In short guys = short lived therefore the rapists are more likely to get their genes passed on.
girls = would like to do the same thing as guys just can't because they can get pregnant + have to raise children.
i.e. not today, the only thing holding women back is obsolete traditions. And even so women have been capable leaders, and drivers, and better flyers, and have started war, and yes, even raped people. I know the last one for a fact.
Your analysis is out of date by some 100,000 years.
Achmed: Causing terror is easy... being politically correct is a pain in the as*!